Allan Rankin

The Internet gambling misadventures chronicled by The Globe and Mail newspaper, and first reported by The Eastern Graphic two years ago, have disappointed and angered Islanders, and further weakened their trust in the politicians who serve them.

I overheard one especially insightful fellow at the Hunter River Irving sum it up this way.

“That bunch in town would steal the cushions right off the couch.”

This smallest of provinces does appear to be governed by a cabal, people ready to follow every bone headed, illusive dream, prepared to pursue every self-interested scheme with public money, while the rest of us bear the national disgrace and ridicule, and sink further into debt.

Historically, we once knew them as the Family Compact, that “band within this land” folk poet Larry Gorman sang about more than a century ago.

Not much has changed.

In the wake of PNP, the e-gambling fiasco contributes to the image other Canadians must have of Prince Edward Island as kind of playschool masquerading as a province, where competing, self-interested political clubs take turns running things.

Premier MacLauchlan says it’s not the way he does business. I hope not. The Business School at UPEI certainly doesn’t teach those ethics. Nevertheless, this is the political culture our new Premier has inherited, and he needs to make immediate and meaningful changes to restore the faith of Islanders in government.

Forgive me, but referring the Internet gambling file to the Auditor General is a political manoeuvre intended to have the whole matter disappear until after the coming election.

It’s now abundantly clear little was learned as a result of PNP.

The outgoing premier trumpeted the success of that program until the last days of his administration, claiming the millions invested in small business across the Island offset the negative effects of a mini economic recession experienced elsewhere.

There might be a grain of truth in this claim, however the PNP was administered preferentially and unfairly, and in my opinion the Public Inquiries Act remains the only way to ever get to the bottom of it all.

Unless you were hooked up by one of a small group of designated agents, or approached by a well-connected lawyer or accountant, the PNP remained a mystery and out of reach for most Island businesses. All government run programs are expected to meet a basic threshold of openness and access, but PNP operated in the shadows, its benefits flowing only to those on a select and much guarded list.

When I was the Clerk of Executive Council during that time, and responsible for administering the Executive Council Act and Public Departments Act on behalf of the premier, even I was kept in the dark. One minister reportedly warned an employee, “whatever you do, don’t let the clerk see the list.”

Presumably I was regarded as too vigilant of a gatekeeper, too unwashed in the ways of business.

I did suspect wrongdoing.

When the Liberal government took office in 2007, there were already glaring signs of abuse by the other major political club, the one waving the blue standard. Several politicians and senior officials had received PNP, and investment units were allocated to local businesses that didn’t in fact exist, such as a manufacturer of handmade wooden boats in Cherry Hill. No boats. Money in the bank.

With the PNP drawing to a close in 2008, efforts ramped up to allocate as many units of investment as possible because the gravy train would soon pull out from the station. Over the last few frenzied months of PNP, eligibility and other policies were ignored in the race to match Asian investors with carefully-chosen Island businesses.

It was a boon to the economy, but also to the governing political party. When I was told by a colleague that PNP units were being peddled as an incentive for the purchase of Liberal fundraising tickets, my concern over PNP deepened.

The Brooke MacMillan affair raised the political temperature on PNP.

In August 2008, Mr MacMillan was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the PEI Liquor Commission, after he was replaced as Deputy Minister of Innovation PEI by Michael Mayne. Though Mayne assumed legal and administrative authority for all departmental and agency programs, including the PNP, Mr MacMillan continued to manage that file.

Minister Brown was compelled to inform Mayne that MacMillan would be completing all PNP transactions for an estimated period of five weeks. To this day, I am unaware of any Executive Council Order or formal directive authorizing this unusual arrangement.

During that period when Mr MacMillan continued to manage the PNP file as CEO of the Liquor Commission, it is estimated that several hundred units of investment were allocated, including investment in a company owned by Brooke and Gina MacMillan.

On October 3, 2008, I brought this apparent conflict of interest to the attention of Premier Robert Ghiz. Initially, I was directed as Clerk of Executive Council to investigate, but after further consideration the task was assigned to then Deputy Provincial Treasurer, the late Paul Jelly.

Surprisingly, Jelly let MacMillan off the hook, though a few months later the Auditor General, upon review of the Provincial Nominee Program, reported that Mr MacMillan indeed had put himself in a conflict of interest situation.

It is believed MacMillan repaid some of his questionable PNP money.

In the end, Brooke MacMillan, who is a close personal friend of the premier got to keep his job. I also realized that after pulling the trigger on Mr MacMillan, my tenure as Clerk of Executive Council and Secretary to Cabinet was going to be short-lived, and sure enough in the fall of 2009 I was moved out of general government.

It is ironic that my last assignment for the premier and Executive Council was the preparation of a new Public Service Code of Conduct and Ethics Management System for Prince Edward Island. Following the embarrassing Brooke MacMillan episode, it was clear to me that much stronger rules governing the ethical conduct of deputy ministers and senior government officials were badly needed.

I submitted my report to the premier in November, 2009.

Nothing happened.

The Liberal leadership at that time, even after being roughed up by the PNP, had no interest in raising the ethical bar within government, no appetite for stronger conflict of interest rules, and no desire to change the prevailing political culture.

The Internet gambling revelations have me shaking my head.

In writing about all of this, I don’t claim for myself any superior public morality.

I am convinced however, if government had implemented some form of the ethics management system I put forward six years ago, the mess we are now confronted with could have been avoided, or at least the barriers to foolish impropriety would have been stronger.

Premier MacLauchlan can find a copy of my 2009 report if he looks for it.

Recommended for you

(4) comments


This is a great article, but Mr Rankin is far too polite towards this bunch of bums, crooks, infidels, and wrong doers that are currently running the government. Same bunch, same stripes. We need unencumbered whistleblower legislation headed up by an Ombudsman, to help prevent this in the future. Morally minded, ethical civil servants need to know their job is safe and free from repercussions should they see wrongdoing and report it. Of course, with the increasing degree of illegality the circles become smaller, making it very difficult to whistleblow anonymously. I, and many Islanders like me, just want our servants to serve us and not themselves. THE VERY FIRST STEP (only step in my view) IS TO RELEASE A LIST OF ALL PEOPLE, COMPANIES, OR WHATEVER, THAT HAVE RECEIVED PUBLIC MONIES FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE. I would have thought the public would have access to all of this to begin with. Why should we have to petition (BEG) to have these documents released? All public monies disbursed should be listed for all to see. We are not at war, except the one between the Libs and Conservs, so why the atmosphere of secrecy? Only if wrongdoing or embarrassing things are happening. We need full disclosure. I believe all incorporated bodies to be held to some legal, moral, or ethical standard to exist, law abiding I would think necessary, but I'm no lawyer. Anyway, both of the 2 old dogs in this race (Libs & Conservs) are corrupted political parties and should be dissolved as the corrupted entities themselves. The political parties want to look at cleaning themselves up, which means a bottom up cleaning, rather than the top down cleaning of old. We need bottom up because the top never clean out themselves.

Plain Truth

This is too funny as the old expression goes "the pot calling the kettle black". Allan Rankin sucked the Liberal T*T for years and years. He even owed his secretaries small change for lunch money and all the while he's collecting a big fat cheque and didn't have the balls to report his accusations until now "when he's trying to make a name for himself as a columnist after failing as a songwriter". look up "weasel" in the dictionary and you'll find Rankin's picture there.


The previous comment, posted by Plain Truth, contains far too many quotation marks. Might want to have a look at that.

Been there

This is laughable. Having worked for Mr. Rankin, I can attest to the shock we all had when he was appointed Clerk. Not sure he worked a full day living such a large salary off of government. Now he's rewriting history and full of sanctimony. I believe Mr. Rankin's lack of a track record speaks for itself other than latching on to the right people at the right time. Not sure how he sees himself being given a plum appointment at IRAC as his days being numbered! He's as complicit as the rest - just now has a pen.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.